Publications

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Search for Publication


Year(s) from:  to 
Author:
Keywords (separated by spaces):

Establishing Construct Validity of a Virtual-Reality Training Simulator for Hysteroscopy via a Multimetric Scoring System

M. Bajka, S. Tuchschmid, D. Fink, G. Székely, and M. Harders
Surgical Endoscopy
pp. DOI 10.1007/s00464-0, 2009

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to determine construct validity for the HystSim virtual-reality (VR) training simulator for hysteroscopy via a new multimetric scoring system (MMSS) and to explore learning curves for both novices and experienced surgeons. METHODS: Fifteen relevant metrics had been identified for diagnostic hysteroscopy by means of hierarchical task decomposition. They were grouped into four modules (visualization, ergonomics, safety, and fluid handling) and individually weighted, building the MMSS for this study. In a first step, 24 novice medical students and 12 experienced gynecologists went through a self-paced teaching tutorial, in which all participants received clearly stated goals and instructions on how to carry out hysteroscopic procedures properly for this study. All subjects performed five repeated trials on two different exercises on HystSim (exploration and diagnosis exercises). After each trial the results were presented to the participants in the form of an automated objective feedback report (AOFR). Construct validity for the MMSS and learning curves were investigated by comparing the performance between novices and experienced surgeons and in between the repeated trials. To study the effect of repeated practice, 23 of the novices returned 2 weeks later for a second training session. RESULTS: Comparing novices with the experienced group, the ergonomics and fluid handling modules resulted in construct validity, while the visualization module did not, and for the safety module the experienced group even scored significantly lower than novices in both exercises. The overall score showed only construct validity when the safety module was excluded. Concerning learning curves, all subjects improved significantly during the training on HystSim, with clear indication that the second training session was beneficial for novice surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Construct validity for HystSim has been established for different modules of VR metrics on a new MMSS developed for diagnostic hysteroscopy. Careful refinement and further testing of metrics and scores is required before using them as assessment tools for operative skills.


Download in pdf format
@Article{eth_biwi_00689,
  author = {M. Bajka and S. Tuchschmid and D. Fink and G. Székely and and M. Harders},
  title = {Establishing Construct Validity of a Virtual-Reality Training Simulator for Hysteroscopy via a Multimetric Scoring System},
  journal = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  year = {2009},
  month = {},
  pages = {DOI 10.1007/s00464-0},
  volume = {},
  number = {},
  keywords = {}
}