Publications

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Search for Publication


Year(s) from:  to 
Author:
Keywords (separated by spaces):

Choosing the Optimal Wall Shear Parameter for the Prediction of Plaque Location–A Patient-Specific Computational Study in Human Right Coronary Arteries

Knight J., Olgac U., Saur S.C., Poulikakos D., Marshall Jr. W., Cattin Ph. C., Alkadhi H., Kurtcuoglu V.
Atherosclerosis
2010, in press

Abstract

Abstract Background Average wall shear stress (AWSS), average wall shear stress gradient (AWSSG), oscillatory shear index (OSI) and relative residence time (RRT) are believed to predict areas vulnerable to plaque formation in the coronary arteries. Our aim was to analyze the correlation of these parameters in patients’ vessels before the onset of atherosclerosis to the specific plaque sites thereafter, and to compare the parameters’ sensitivity and positive predictive value. Methods We obtained 30 patient-specific geometries (mean age 67.1 (±9.2) years, all with stable angina) of the right coronary artery (RCA) using dual-source computed tomography (CT) and virtually removed any plaque present. We then performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to calculate the wall shear parameters. Results For the 120 total plaques, AWSS had on average a higher sensitivity for the prediction of plaque locations (72% ± 25%) than AWSSG (68% ± 36%), OSI (60% ± 30%, p < 0.05), and RRT (69% ± 59%); while OSI had a higher positive predict value (PPV) (68% ± 34%) than AWSS (47% ± 27%, p < 0.001), AWSSG (37% ± 23, p < 0.001) and RRT (59% ± 34%). A significant difference was also found between AWSSG and RRT (p < 0.01) concerning PPV. Conclusions OSI and RRT are the optimal parameters when the number of false-positives is to be minimized. AWSS accurately identifies the largest number of plaques, but produces more false positives than OSI and RRT.


Link to publisher's page
@Article{eth_biwi_00725,
  author = {Knight J. and Olgac U. and Saur S.C. and Poulikakos D. and Marshall Jr. W. and Cattin Ph. C. and Alkadhi H. and Kurtcuoglu V.},
  title = {Choosing the Optimal Wall Shear Parameter for the Prediction of Plaque Location–A Patient-Specific Computational Study in Human Right Coronary Arteries},
  journal = {Atherosclerosis},
  year = {2010},
  month = {},
  pages = {},
  volume = {},
  number = {},
  keywords = {},
  note = {in press}
}