This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Search for Publication

Year(s) from:  to 
Keywords (separated by spaces):

Comparing a Simplified FEM Approach with the Mass-Spring Model for Surgery Simulation

M. Harders, R. Hutter, A. Rutz, P. Niederer and G. Székely
Medicine Meets Virtual Reality


Virtual reality based surgical simulators offer a very elegant approach to enhancing traditional training in endoscopic surgery. In this context a realistic soft tissue model is of central importance. The most accurate procedures for modeling elastic deformations of tissue use the Finite Element Method (FEM) to solve the governing mechanical equations. An alternative are mass-spring models which are a crude approximation of the real physical behavior. The main reason given when using the mass-spring approach is the computational complexity of FEM. In this study we show that an optimized linear FEM model requires computation time similar to the mass-spring approach, while giving better results.

  author = {M. Harders and R. Hutter and A. Rutz and P. Niederer and G. Székely},
  title = {Comparing a Simplified FEM Approach with the Mass-Spring Model for Surgery Simulation},
  booktitle = {Medicine Meets Virtual Reality},
  year = {2003},
  pages = {103-109},
  keywords = {}