Publications

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Search for Publication


Year(s) from:  to 
Author:
Keywords (separated by spaces):

Computer Aided Detection of Breast Masses in Mammography using Support Vector Machine Classification

J. Lesniak, R. Hupse, M. Kallenberg, M. Samulski, R. Blanc, N. Karssemeijer and G. Székely
Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging 2011 Computer-Aided Diagnosis
2011

Abstract

The reduction of false positive marks in breast mass CAD is an active area of research. Typically, the problem can be approached either by developing more discriminative features or by employing different classifier designs. Usually one intends to find an optimal combination of classifier configuration and small number of features to ensure high classification performance and a robust model with good generalization capabilities. In this paper, we investigate the potential benefit of relying on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier for the detection of masses. The evaluation is based on a 10-fold cross validation over a large database of screen film mammograms (10397 images). The purpose of this study is twofold: first, we assess the SVM performance compared to neural networks (NNet), k-nearest neighbor classification (k-NN) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Second, we study the classifiers' performances when using a set of 30 and a set of 73 region-based features. The CAD performance is quantified by the mean sensitivity in 0.05 to 1 false positives per exam on the free-response receiver operating characteristic curve. The best mean exam sensitivities found were 0.545, 0.636, 0.648, 0.675 for LDA, k-NN, NNet and SVM. K-NN and NNet proved to be stable against variation of the featuresets. Conversely, LDA and SVM exhibited an increase in performance when adding more features. It is concluded that with an SVM a more pronounced reduction of false positives is possible, given that a large number of cases and features are available.


Download in pdf format
@InProceedings{eth_biwi_00765,
  author = {J. Lesniak and R. Hupse and M. Kallenberg and M. Samulski and R. Blanc and N. Karssemeijer and G. Székely},
  title = {Computer Aided Detection of Breast Masses in Mammography using Support Vector Machine Classification},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging 2011 Computer-Aided Diagnosis},
  year = {2011},
  pages = {79631K},
  volume = {7963},
  editor = {Ronald M. Summers and Bram van Ginneken},
  publisher = {SPIE},
  keywords = {}
}